Cygnette attended the ballet last night. Fanfare by Robbins, a short Wheedon, Balanchine's Orpheus, and Robbins' Four Seasons make for one long and peculiarly shaped evening.
Since Nilas Martins, as Orpheus, had the acting range and stylistic understanding of David Boreanaz, Cygnette could have more pleasantly spent act II drinking heavily in the foyer.
Both Fanfare and Four Seasons are all-out, big company pieces. Fanfare started out looking a bit raggedy. The dancers were not to blame: they are tired, fighting injuries, and under-rehearsed, probably. They may be missing a misunderstood, but necessary, process for works such as these: a person to yell them into shape. Robbins used to do it. Makarova still does it, for her productions. Is she available?
Cygnette is not sure what she thinks of Christopher Wheedon, yet. Within Friday's program, his Liturgy looked *wrong,* because hermetic. There were no echoes, no allusions, no references to anything outside of the two figures doing incredibly clever and difficult partnering together.
Balanchine's work processes all sorts of other arts, music first of all, into the dance. With Robbins, you see him processing the Balanchine vocabulary, and the company style, as well as Broadway and "showbiz" into his dance. The "Summer" section of Four Seasons echoes Mediterranean dance steps in just a couple of bars, but you get the allusion immediately. Even Orpheus (undone by the unsuitability of its music) has the Lost Souls looking like a Hieronymus Bosch painting come to life.
But Wheeldon's work (yes, Cygnette has only seen Liturgy and what she likes to call "Vee Ay Ay Ay") is affectless, uninterested in banging up against the creative world that's out there. Pity, that, since he has talent.
Or is this what post-modern ballet is all about?